Hampshire Squash Rackets Association
Online League Management System 2019/2020
League Rules
Mens Section

[Main] [Fixtures]
 

Which? Recommended  Energy Supplier.
 
Trojans
Club Address Stoneham Lane Eastleigh Hants Post Code SO50 9HT Google Map
Download VCard
Telephone 023 8061 2400 Fax
Website http://www.trojansquash.co.uk Email
Club Fixtures Secretary Callum Greasley Email

DIVISION 3 - Trojans 6 (6) versus Fair Oak 3 (3) played on 31-Oct-2019 at 19:20

String Home Team Player Ranking Grading Away Team Player Ranking Grading Score Result
1 Mark Alderman Squash Levels for Mark  Alderman 26 (26) 2604 Christopher Luetchford Squash Levels for Christopher  Luetchford 14 (14) 2375 15-11 15-13 15-11 3-0
2 Alex Biro Squash Levels for Alex  Biro 27 (27) 2323 James Dickins Squash Levels for James  Dickins 15 (15) 2318 15-12 11-15 15-5 15-12 3-1
3 David Parker Squash Levels for David  Parker 28 (28) 2535 Neil Piper Squash Levels for Neil  Piper 16 (16) 2267 15-13 8-15 A 1-3
4 Tom Sanderson Squash Levels for Tom  Sanderson 29 (29) 2487 Andrew Codrai Squash Levels for Andrew  Codrai 17 (17) 2451 15-9 15-3 15-10 3-0
5 Walkover Squash Levels for Walkover 0 (0) 0 No Show Squash Levels for No Show 0 (0) 0 H 3-0
(U) - Unranked at time of match Home Team Away Team
Trojans 6 Beat Fair Oak 3 by Strings
4 1
Games
13 4
Win Bonus
5 0
League Organiser Adjustment
0 -5
Points
18 -1

Match Report Press Report League Organiser Comments

Trojans 6 Beat Fair Oak 3.

With the home team having higher Gradings in 3 of the strings, the match was always going to be in their favour. This turned out to be the case with a Home win.

On paper, the number 2 string should have been the closest, with only 5 ranking points separating the two players before the match. Home advantage prevailed though, with Alex Biro winning through.

It was the number 2 String which turned out to be the most competitive, with the Players battling out over a total of 100 Points ! Victory finally going to the Home Player, Alex Biro.

If the Home No. 3 player, David Parker, had not had to withdraw after 2 game(s) the result could have been closer.
Rule 8.6 applies.